To modify your purchase order,
contact the auction house.
The reserve price is the minimum price accepted by the seller. Bidders cannot see this price. To win an item, you must place the highest bid and meet or exceed the reserve price.
Registrations are closed for this sale. You cannot place a bid.
The converted amounts are provided for informational purposes only. Only the currency determined for the sale by the auction house is binding. You can select a different currency by going to the "Preferences" page in your profile.
Fees including the auction house's fees and the platform's fees. For further details, please refer to the auction house's General Terms and Conditions of Sale.
JOHN HOPPNER (BRITISH 1759-1810)INFANT VANITYOil on panel58 x 66.5cm (22¾ x 26in.)Painted in 1789.Exhibited:Royal Academy, London, 1789 (no. 176)Literature:W. McKay and W. Roberts, John Hoppner, R.A., London, 1909, p.301, where listed erroneously as 'Infant Variety'H. P. K. Skipton, John Hoppner, London: Methuen & Co., 1905, p. XII, p. 168The Royal Academy, The Exhibition of the Royal Academy of Arts, M.DCC.LXXXIX, The Twenty First, London: T. Cadell, 1789, p. 7, no. 176Engraved:John Young, After John Hoppner, Infant Vanity (1789) (BM 2010,7081.3587)Thisengaging work entitled Infant Vanity was exhibited by John Hoppner atthe Royal Academy in 1789, the year he was appointed portrait painter to thePrince of Wales, later King George IV. The subject and free handling displayHoppner’s well documented debt to Sir Joshua Reynolds, particularly in thelatter’s ‘fancy pictures’ such as The Infant Academy (1781-2;London, Kenwood House, Iveagh Bequest) and A Child with Guardian Angels (1786;private collection), both of which were exhibited at the Academy, in 1782 and1786 respectively. That Hoppner chose to execute the present work on panel isarguably further evidence of Reynolds’ pervasive influence. In his Dictionaryof British 18th Century Painters (1981, p. 181), the ever incisive EllisWaterhouse noted that Hoppner’s most successful work was his group portraits ofchildren, including that of his own, now at Washington (1791; National Galleryof Art). According to Horace Pitt Kennedy Skipton’s 1905 text, the present painting was probably modelled on the Washington picture.
Delivery is optional. You can use the carrier of your choice. The stated price does not include the lot price or the auction house fees.